Bias in Mediation: Exploring the American Role in the Camp David Summit 2000 / Mohamed Seddiki

Public ISBD Titre : Bias in Mediation: Exploring the American Role in the Camp David Summit 2000 Type de document : texte manuscrit Auteurs : Mohamed Seddiki, Auteur ; Assia Guellil, Auteur Editeur : Laghouat : University Amar Telidji - Department of English Année de publication : 2024 Importance : 64 p Accompagnement : CD Langues : Anglais Catégories : THESES :20 Langue et litterature anglaise Mots-clés : Bias, Camp David Summit, Israel, Middle East, Palestine, Peace Process, US Mediation. Résumé : This research aims to critically analyse the American mediation during the Camp David Summit in the year 2000, specifically whether the United States was biased in favour of Israel to the prejudice of Palestine. The central aim is, therefore, to establish whether the US could be deemed neutral and, therefore, efficient in the process of its diplomatic process within this critical phase of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. To achieve this, the research retraces the historical trajectory of US-Israeli diplomatic relations since 1948, in order to critically analyse the way strategic, political, and economic variables influenced American intervention within the Middle East Peace Process. The methodology used is qualitative method. This research method provides a suitable tool to analyse critically the US intervention's motives at the Camp David Summit, strategies used during the negotiation of the mediation, and the techniques of negotiation and diplomatic moves that ensued. The results indicate an apparent bias in the US approach in favour of Israel. Such bias is, however, evident in the strategies, diplomatic paths, and narratives of American mediators during the summit. The research shows that the US Israeli relationship, which is characterized by closeness due to strategic, political, and economic support, actively shaped the process of peace overall and most of the time disadvantaged the interests of Palestine note de thèses : Master Degree In Literature And Civilization Bias in Mediation: Exploring the American Role in the Camp David Summit 2000 [texte manuscrit] / Mohamed Seddiki, Auteur ; Assia Guellil, Auteur . - Laghouat : University Amar Telidji - Department of English, 2024 . - 64 p + CD. Langues : Anglais Catégories : THESES :20 Langue et litterature anglaise Mots-clés : Bias, Camp David Summit, Israel, Middle East, Palestine, Peace Process, US Mediation. Résumé : This research aims to critically analyse the American mediation during the Camp David Summit in the year 2000, specifically whether the United States was biased in favour of Israel to the prejudice of Palestine. The central aim is, therefore, to establish whether the US could be deemed neutral and, therefore, efficient in the process of its diplomatic process within this critical phase of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. To achieve this, the research retraces the historical trajectory of US-Israeli diplomatic relations since 1948, in order to critically analyse the way strategic, political, and economic variables influenced American intervention within the Middle East Peace Process. The methodology used is qualitative method. This research method provides a suitable tool to analyse critically the US intervention's motives at the Camp David Summit, strategies used during the negotiation of the mediation, and the techniques of negotiation and diplomatic moves that ensued. The results indicate an apparent bias in the US approach in favour of Israel. Such bias is, however, evident in the strategies, diplomatic paths, and narratives of American mediators during the summit. The research shows that the US Israeli relationship, which is characterized by closeness due to strategic, political, and economic support, actively shaped the process of peace overall and most of the time disadvantaged the interests of Palestine note de thèses : Master Degree In Literature And Civilization

Réservation

Réserver ce document

Exemplaires

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Thlg 20.496	Thlg 20.496	CD	BIBLIOTHEQUE DES LITTERATURES ET LANGUES	Lettres et langue anglaises (bll)	Disponible

Double Standards in the U.S. Foreign Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Approaches to the Ukrainian and Palestinian Conflicts / Belkheir,Elhadj Ahmed

Public ISBD Titre : Double Standards in the U.S. Foreign Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Approaches to the Ukrainian and Palestinian Conflicts Type de document : texte manuscrit Auteurs : Belkheir,Elhadj Ahmed, Auteur ; Mohamed Seddiki, Directeur de thèse Editeur : Laghouat : University Amar Telidji - Department of English Année de publication : 2024 Importance : 134 p. Accompagnement : CD Langues : Anglais Catégories : THESES :20 Langue et litterature anglaise Mots-clés : the United States, Ukraine, Palestine, the double standards Résumé : The international policy of the United States is the approach by which the US deals with foreign countries. The U.S. is still profoundly influential in the world as the main superpower. The creation of a safe and democratic world for the American people and the international community is the primary objective of the United States' foreign policy. Through a comparative analysis, the study reveals how strategic priorities and domestic political pressures significantly shape U.S. responses to international conflicts, frequently resulting in contradictory applications of moral and legal standards. The study uses Ukraine and Palestine as case studies to examine the double standards evident in United States foreign affairs. This work seeks to investigate whether U.S. foreign policy towards Palestine was a double standard. The analysis examines how the inconsistencies in American strategy decisions steadfastly support Ukrainian supremacy despite Russian hostility while at the same time moving Israel's occupation and human rights infringement in Palestine. The outcomes show the more extensive ramifications of these hypocritical standards, especially concerning The American government’s validity in worldwide leadership and global relations. The study additionally addresses what these irregularities mean for The States' diplomatic ties, add to provincial insecurity, and undermine the values of freedom and fundamental human rights that the U.S. claims to maintain on the global stage. note de thèses : Master Degree In Literature And Civilization Double Standards in the U.S. Foreign Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Approaches to the Ukrainian and Palestinian Conflicts [texte manuscrit] / Belkheir,Elhadj Ahmed, Auteur ; Mohamed Seddiki, Directeur de thèse . - Laghouat : University Amar Telidji - Department of English, 2024 . - 134 p. + CD. Langues : Anglais Catégories : THESES :20 Langue et litterature anglaise Mots-clés : the United States, Ukraine, Palestine, the double standards Résumé : The international policy of the United States is the approach by which the US deals with foreign countries. The U.S. is still profoundly influential in the world as the main superpower. The creation of a safe and democratic world for the American people and the international community is the primary objective of the United States' foreign policy. Through a comparative analysis, the study reveals how strategic priorities and domestic political pressures significantly shape U.S. responses to international conflicts, frequently resulting in contradictory applications of moral and legal standards. The study uses Ukraine and Palestine as case studies to examine the double standards evident in United States foreign affairs. This work seeks to investigate whether U.S. foreign policy towards Palestine was a double standard. The analysis examines how the inconsistencies in American strategy decisions steadfastly support Ukrainian supremacy despite Russian hostility while at the same time moving Israel's occupation and human rights infringement in Palestine. The outcomes show the more extensive ramifications of these hypocritical standards, especially concerning The American government’s validity in worldwide leadership and global relations. The study additionally addresses what these irregularities mean for The States' diplomatic ties, add to provincial insecurity, and undermine the values of freedom and fundamental human rights that the U.S. claims to maintain on the global stage. note de thèses : Master Degree In Literature And Civilization

Réservation

Réserver ce document

Exemplaires

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Thlg 20.510	Thlg 20.510	CD	BIBLIOTHEQUE DES LITTERATURES ET LANGUES	Lettres et langue anglaises (bll)	Disponible

---

page 1/1