Catalogue des ouvrages Université de Laghouat
A partir de cette page vous pouvez :
Détail de l'auteur
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche

Titre : | Examining writing : research and practice in assessing second language writing | Type de document : | texte imprimé | Auteurs : | Stuart D. Shaw, Auteur ; Cyril Weir, Auteur | Editeur : | Cambridge [United Kingdom] : Cambridge University Press | Collection : | Studies in language testing 21 num. 26  | Importance : | xiv, 344 p. | Présentation : | ill. | Format : | 24 cm. | ISBN/ISSN/EAN : | 978-0-521-69293-9 | Langues : | Anglais | Catégories : | LITTERATURE ET LANGUE ANGLAISE:420 Généralites et applications linguistiques
| Mots-clés : | Language and languages Ability testing Rhetoric Ability testing. | Résumé : | This Publication Highlights The Need For Test Developers To Provide Clear Explanations Of The Ability Constructs Which Underpin Tests Offered In The Public Domain. An Explanation Is Increasingly Required, If The Validity Of Test Score Interpretation And Use Are To Be Supported Both Logically, And With Empirical Evidence. The Book Demonstrates The Application Of A Comprehensive Test Validation Framework Which Adopts A Socio-Cognitive Perspective. The Framework Embraces Six Core Components Which Reflect The Practical Nature And Quality Of An Actual Testing Event. It Examines Cambridge Esol Writing Tasks From The Following Perspectives: Test Taker, Cognitive Validity, Context Validity, Scoring Validity, Criterion-Related Validity And Consequential Validity. The Authors Show How An Understanding And Analysis Of The Framework And Its Components In Relation To Specific Writing Tests Can Assist Test Developers To Operationalise Their Tests More Effectively, Especially In Relation To Criterial Distinctions Across Test Levels. This Volume Describes The Theory And Practice Of Cambridge Esol'S Approach To Assessing Second Language Writing Ability. |
Examining writing : research and practice in assessing second language writing [texte imprimé] / Stuart D. Shaw, Auteur ; Cyril Weir, Auteur . - Cambridge (United Kingdom) : Cambridge University Press, [s.d.] . - xiv, 344 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.. - ( Studies in language testing 21; 26) . ISBN : 978-0-521-69293-9 Langues : Anglais Catégories : | LITTERATURE ET LANGUE ANGLAISE:420 Généralites et applications linguistiques
| Mots-clés : | Language and languages Ability testing Rhetoric Ability testing. | Résumé : | This Publication Highlights The Need For Test Developers To Provide Clear Explanations Of The Ability Constructs Which Underpin Tests Offered In The Public Domain. An Explanation Is Increasingly Required, If The Validity Of Test Score Interpretation And Use Are To Be Supported Both Logically, And With Empirical Evidence. The Book Demonstrates The Application Of A Comprehensive Test Validation Framework Which Adopts A Socio-Cognitive Perspective. The Framework Embraces Six Core Components Which Reflect The Practical Nature And Quality Of An Actual Testing Event. It Examines Cambridge Esol Writing Tasks From The Following Perspectives: Test Taker, Cognitive Validity, Context Validity, Scoring Validity, Criterion-Related Validity And Consequential Validity. The Authors Show How An Understanding And Analysis Of The Framework And Its Components In Relation To Specific Writing Tests Can Assist Test Developers To Operationalise Their Tests More Effectively, Especially In Relation To Criterial Distinctions Across Test Levels. This Volume Describes The Theory And Practice Of Cambridge Esol'S Approach To Assessing Second Language Writing Ability. |
|  |
Réservation
Réserver ce document
Exemplaires
Disponibilité |
---|
420.101-1 | 420.101-1 | Livre interne | BIBLIOTHEQUE CENTRALE | Lettres et Langue Anglaises (bc) | Disponible |
420.101-2 | 420.101-2 | Livre interne | BIBLIOTHEQUE CENTRALE | Lettres et Langue Anglaises (bc) | Disponible |
420.101-3 | 420.101-3 | Livre externe | BIBLIOTHEQUE DES LITTERATURES ET LANGUES | Lettres et langue anglaises (bll) | Disponible |
420.101-4 | 420.101-4 | Livre externe | BIBLIOTHEQUE DES LITTERATURES ET LANGUES | Lettres et langue anglaises (bll) | Disponible |
420.101-5 | 420.101-5 | Livre externe | BIBLIOTHEQUE DES LITTERATURES ET LANGUES | Lettres et langue anglaises (bll) | Disponible |

Titre : | studies in languege testing 26 : examing writing | Type de document : | texte imprimé | Auteurs : | Stuart D. Shaw, Auteur ; Cyril Weir, Auteur | Editeur : | Cambridge [United Kingdom] : Cambridge University Press | Année de publication : | 2008 | Importance : | 344p. | Format : | 24cm. | ISBN/ISSN/EAN : | 798-0-521-69293-9 | Langues : | Anglais | Mots-clés : | studies in language testing 26 | Résumé : | this volume describes the theory and practice of cambridge esol's approach to assessing second language writing ability.a comprehensive tests validation framework is used to examine the tasks in cambridge esol writing testes from a number of different validity perspectives that reflect the socio-cognitive nature of any assessment event.the authors show an understanding and analysis of the framework and its components can assist tests developers to operationalise their tests more effectively,especiallyin relation to the key criteria that differentiate one proficiency level from another. |
studies in languege testing 26 : examing writing [texte imprimé] / Stuart D. Shaw, Auteur ; Cyril Weir, Auteur . - Cambridge (United Kingdom) : Cambridge University Press, 2008 . - 344p. ; 24cm. ISSN : 798-0-521-69293-9 Langues : Anglais Mots-clés : | studies in language testing 26 | Résumé : | this volume describes the theory and practice of cambridge esol's approach to assessing second language writing ability.a comprehensive tests validation framework is used to examine the tasks in cambridge esol writing testes from a number of different validity perspectives that reflect the socio-cognitive nature of any assessment event.the authors show an understanding and analysis of the framework and its components can assist tests developers to operationalise their tests more effectively,especiallyin relation to the key criteria that differentiate one proficiency level from another. |
|  |